The Wind in the Willows

When the books I’m reading start, cumulatively, to get a little dark, it’s nice to take a step back once in a while and indulge in a more playful book. The Wind In The Willows is a curious example this, because it treats its characters and scenes with a gravity that you simply don’t find in modern children’s fiction. The world of the Willows is a mishmash of fantastic ideas, and the sincerity with which Kenneth Grahame underpins the whole enterprise lends an air of wonderment to the proceedings, anchoring passages of unashamed fun to a substantial foundation while infusing the more emotional moments with oodles of pathos. This, in turn, creates a rock-solid emotional bond between the reader and the characters, making for an absorbing and emotionally satisfying narrative.

When you stop to think about it, though, the structure of the book is kind of bizarre. There’s a central narrative which goes roughly as follows; the four main characters meet, Toad gets himself into trouble, escapes these troubles, and they all then band together to defeat a common enemy. That’s a very simple skeleton, but the meat on those bones is what makes the book interesting.dirda_1-081309

Sometimes Grahame will press pause on the main story and devote a chapter to Mole and Rat having an unrelated adventure before bringing the reader back to check in on the main narrative. This means the reader spends much more time with Rat and Mole, which demonstrates where Grahame’s authorial sympathies lie.

Allow me to explain. Mr Toad is the breakout character in the story, and the one most readers will remember first when the book is mentioned, and for good reason – he propels much of the plot, and is the most outrageously entertaining character by far. But he is also reprehensible; a charlatan and a fiend, and utterly despicable in more than a few ways. He’s the definition of a loveable rogue, but beneath all of the bluster and noise, he’s not actually all that interesting. The inception and development of the friendship between Mole and Rat is much more endearing, and provides a real emotional centre for much of the narrative. Grahame recognises that the reader would benefit from investing in that relationship, but he also recognises that Mr Toad could easily overpower the narrative without intervention. The device of introducing random side quests for Rat and Mole is a really interesting response to this, both when it works (such as when they discover Mole’s old home) and when it doesn’t (such as when Rat nearly gets hypnotised into joining the Navy). It also expands the world of the Willows, introducing us to more characters and places, and even developing the mysticism of the world in a truly fascinating passage where they stumble across the demigod Pan.0_0_s84p

In trying to pin down what makes the book truly great, I ended up confusing myself a little by summarising all of its quirky contradictions. The four main characters are all male, yet this is in no way a “boyish” book; Mr Toad embodies some pretty egregious vices, and yet he’s the most widely beloved character in the story; the structure is episodic but it flows well, while the pacing is “varying”, to be kind, and yet still pretty satisfying…I think the illustrations by the incomparable E.H. Shepard (who, perhaps most famously, illustrated A.A. Milne’s Winnie the Pooh) perfectly captures what makes the book so loveable: they’re slightly otherworldly, but homely; you feel as if you could reach out and touch them, yet somehow they’re always a little out of reach. The Willows really are a magical place, and I can’t think of anyone I’d prefer to guide me through them than Rat, Mole, Badger, or Mr Toad.


4 thoughts on “The Wind in the Willows

  1. This is such a great review! I’ve never read The Wind in the Willows. It’s always in the back of my mind as something I should get around to, but I just never do. But your analysis makes it sound quite interesting from at least a structural point of view. One of these days I shall indeed have to read it now. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    • I have just watched the Disney cartoon in order to answer your question 🙂 the book is DEFINITELY better than the cartoon – Disney spends far too long on the court case and invents a moustache-twirling villain that’s not present in the book, but as I mentioned in my review it commits the cardinal sin of focussing far too much on Toad. The book is much more balanced and easy-going, and has a lot more going on beneath the surface than the cartoon does 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

This is the internet, of course you have space to write what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s